Go Back   Diễn Đàn Hạt Nắng > Tâm Sự, Bình Luận, Tranh Luận > Phòng Thời Sự và Chính Trị
Gallery Recipes Phim Nhạc Tuổi Hoa Phát Thanh HN Tiếng Hát HN Nhịp Cầu Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Post New Thread  Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-17-2012, 09:54 AM   #1
MiNo
Lớp Mười
 
MiNo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 32,196
MiNo is on a distinguished road
Media bias?

Ai cũng bảo người khác là tuyên truyền, chả biết đách gì hết, chỉ có... tui là biết

Tuyên truyền hay không thì... coi ông này đây ! Tụi liberals nó... xơi ráo hết nếu như không vừa ý với nó...

Here is the guy with all the credentials as a writer and rooted as a Democrat. See what happened when he changed his mind...

What about his ássessment of liberal media bias

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/frid...g-mitt-romney/
MiNo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2012, 09:58 AM   #2
aqg
Lớp Tám
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,491
aqg is on a distinguished road
Không tui nghĩ tui liberals ở đây đứa nào cũng chẳng biết gì hết, chỉ có Mino là biết thôi.... How about that?

Tui biết thế nào hôm nay cũng có người không vui ở HN.

Media bias?

Debate 1: Obama thua, media tuyên bố Obama thua. Poll tuyên bố Obama thua. Chẳng thấy ai nói media bias.

Debate 2: 1 số media nói Obama thắng, tuy Romney cũng khá. Polls nói Obama thắng. Mấy bác CH complain media bias.

Bó tay
__________________

aqg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2012, 10:17 AM   #3
FAIR VIEW
Lớp Tám
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,564
FAIR VIEW is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by aqg View Post
Không tui nghĩ tui liberals ở đây đứa nào cũng chẳng biết gì hết, chỉ có Mino là biết thôi.... How about that?

Tui biết thế nào hôm nay cũng có người không vui ở HN.

Media bias?

Debate 1: Obama thua, media tuyên bố Obama thua. Poll tuyên bố Obama thua. Chẳng thấy ai nói media bias.

Debate 2: 1 số media nói Obama thắng, tuy Romney cũng khá. Polls nói Obama thắng. Mấy bác CH complain media bias.

Bó tay
aqg, khổ lắm nói mãi cũng thế , tụi Báo chí nó biết sự thực chớ nhưng nó Biased vì nó sided với Obumer. Nên 1 Pollster của Dém có nói bọn Báo Chí bây giờ không làm nhiệm vụ của nó là bảo vệ nền dân chủ mà đà abused cái quyền Free Speech của bọn Báo chí. Chả thế thời còn chiến tranh lạnh sau khi CS Liên Sô bank rolled cho CSBV chiếm chọn miền Nam bất kể sự Guarranty của Soviet Union về ngừnng bắn năm 1973.

Brezhnev có phán 1 câu sau khi Nga chiếm chọn VN đang đóng tại Cam Ranh, Đà Nẵng, Afghan, Ethiopy qua Cuban Proxy , rồi CS làm TT tại Chile, Angolan War do Proxy Cuban võ khí Nga, rồi loạn tại trung Mỹ do Cuban giúp với võ khí đôi khi là M-16 với serial number Bộ QP isssued cho VNCH xuất hiện tại Nam Mỹ , trung Mỹ ngào AK-47.................Chủ Tịt hay TT Brezehnev có phán 1 câu xanh rời vì ăn bẫm dzựt dây bọn Biased Pressed và bọn Progressive chống chiến tranh VN tại các thành phố lớn qua bọ Progressive CPUSA , hắn phán sự tự do báo chí là mồ chôn bọn Tây Phương ( Hoa Kỳ included ) chủ nghĩa CS sắp toàn thắng.

Ngày hôm nay bọn Progressive qua danh làm Báo hay Ký giả tầm cỡ như Martha Raadatz, Candy Crowley đà show off với sự Biase mà không ngại ngừng trước công chúng .
FAIR VIEW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2012, 10:22 AM   #4
Gai nho.n
Lớp Tám
 
Gai nho.n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 17,246
Gai nho.n is on a distinguished road
Yes, Gai đồng ý Media left side bias
Hide news, and lier , lừa bịp ngườii đọc
mấy ngày nay search and search lia lịa thì thấy quả thật như vậy
đến nỗi nhìn mấy trang đó mà ngán ngẫm
__________________


Taking a more simplistic and positive view of your life costs nothing, but it could bring you riches.- S.T.
http://www.pray-as-you-go.org/
Gai nho.n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2012, 11:01 AM   #5
Út Đẹt
Lớp Tám
 
Út Đẹt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,014
Út Đẹt has disabled reputation
Quote:
From there, the two discussed what exactly it means that Bissinger’s friends have branded him a “traitor.”

Bissinger remarked:

“There’s no doubt in my mind that there’s a definite liberal bias in the mainstream media…You are simply not expected, when you’re a journalist and a writer, to endorse a Republican. And don’t tell me it does not seep into the coverage. I mean, you look at The New York Times, you look at their editorial today on Afghanistan, you would feel it’s the Republicans’ fault we’re still there, but that’s Obama’s decision. It does seep in, and I know because as a journalist it seeped in when I wrote for the Philadelphia Enquirer.”

So what has he learned from the experience?
Bissinger said:

I thought liberals were supposed to be ‘open-minded.’ I thought they were supposed to accept divergent viewpoints to at least say, ‘hey, everyone in America has a right to an opinion.’ But it’s really about– ‘I love free speech as long as it’s the free speech that I want’ … Liberals have this sense of themselves, but 90% are as nasty, as vitriolic, as vicious as the conservatives they say are…

That is it! Once you go conservative, you can't go back... I guess Bissinger will be banned for life
__________________

Cây có cội, nước có nguồn
Dù bàn chân ta đi khắp mười phương
Ta vẫn nghe trăm điệu hát
Tiếng quê người hòa chung tiếng mẹ ru...
(Trầm Tử Thiêng)
Út Đẹt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2012, 11:01 AM   #6
FAIR VIEW
Lớp Tám
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,564
FAIR VIEW is on a distinguished road
How the Libya Question Boosts Mitt Romney

How the Libya Question Boosts Mitt Romney

The Daily Beast ^ | Oct 17, 2012 | Michael Medved

Posted on Wed Oct 17 2012 07:58:43 GMT-0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) by Qbert


A complicated three-way tangle drew in Candy Crowley for an utterly outrageous effort to tag-team the governor. But Romney shouldn’t worry, writes Michael Medved, it just made him look better.

[Snip]

Mitt made the mistake of wading into a pointless dispute about parsing words where the reputedly impartial moderator ended up outrageously taking sides.

[Snip]

Nevertheless, this brief combination of farce and melodrama will nonetheless benefit the Romney campaign for two reasons:

First, any prolonged discussion of Libya obviously hurts the president, not Romney, and the mangled muddle in this encounter fairly begs for clarification in the next debate, which is supposed to focus on foreign policy anyway. On that occasion Romney may even be able to make clear that on his basic indictment of Obama’s ineptitude and confusion he was right while the president and, yes, Candy Crowley, were wrong.

Which raises the second hidden advantage for the GOP in the second debate’s most uncomfortable and confusing moments. Crowley’s misguided malfeasance in the moderator’s role should produce a morning-after apology, but even if it doesn’t it feeds into the powerful (and largely accurate) conservative meta-narrative about prevailing media bias.

Can anyone open-mindedly read the transcripts of the debate, and go back to the transcript of the Rose Garden statement that Crowley recklessly mischaracterized, and honestly suggest that she acted the part of an effective honest broker?

Polling suggests that hefty majorities of Americans (including most of the all-important independents) already assume that major media report the news with a generous dose of political bias. The fact that Romney held his own in this setting (the early post-debate polls suggest that uncommitted voters saw the duel as a virtual draw) only makes his performance more impressive.

(Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com

Last edited by FAIR VIEW : 10-17-2012 at 11:10 AM.
FAIR VIEW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2012, 11:18 AM   #7
MiNo
Lớp Mười
 
MiNo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 32,196
MiNo is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by aqg View Post
Không tui nghĩ tui liberals ở đây đứa nào cũng chẳng biết gì hết, chỉ có Mino là biết thôi.... How about that?

Tui biết thế nào hôm nay cũng có người không vui ở HN.

Media bias?

Debate 1: Obama thua, media tuyên bố Obama thua. Poll tuyên bố Obama thua. Chẳng thấy ai nói media bias.

Debate 2: 1 số media nói Obama thắng, tuy Romney cũng khá. Polls nói Obama thắng. Mấy bác CH complain media bias.

Bó tay
Tôi quả thật là bó tay với bác luôn !!!

Bác đọc thread, nhưng... có đọc không dzị hả?

Tôi chưa nói tới chuyện Candy Crowley biased tối hôm qua ở đây. Tôi đang nói chuyện khứa này khứa complained về liberals bias in the media ! Cái này tôi complained nhiều lần, rất nhiều lần rồi. Nhân tiện nói về media bias, tôi đã mở thread riêng. Bác lại cố tình tròng tréo nó với chuyện debate tối hôm qua !

Bác có thấy bác rắc rối hay không?

Nói về câu nói này của bác

Debate 1: Obama thua, media tuyên bố Obama thua. Poll tuyên bố Obama thua. Chẳng thấy ai nói media bias.



Bác có... lộn không dzị??? Debate 1, Romney thắng "không thể cãi nổi" và cũng cái liberals media hơn 1 lần, hơn một người complained Jim Lehrer tới nổi ổng bảo "thôi tôi chừa, tôi sẽ không bao giờ moderate presidential debate nữa" http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/...es-138455.html

"Heavy criticism" bác làm ơn đọc nhé !

Còn mợ Crowley thì... nhào dzô "tặng" cho tông tông điểm liền tức khắc luôn. Bác nghĩ các cậu mợ liberals sẽ viết gì, làm gì nếu như Crowley một tay bợ Romney 1 cú như thế?

Again, nói đây cho biết sự việc nó xảy ra như thế nào, chứ chuyện bác có cực đoan hay không, liberal hay chả cũng... chả dính dáng gì đến tôi đâu ! Bác làm ơn đi, chừng nào tôi lôi bác ra tôi nói thì bác hẵng trả lời, bằng không làm ơn dẹp dùm cái dzụ

Quote:
" Không tui nghĩ tui liberals ở đây đứa nào cũng chẳng biết gì hết, chỉ có Mino là biết thôi.... How about that?
Đọc nghe nó... nhỏ mọn quá đấy bác !
MiNo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2012, 11:31 AM   #8
MiNo
Lớp Mười
 
MiNo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 32,196
MiNo is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Út Đẹt View Post
Quote:
From there, the two discussed what exactly it means that Bissinger’s friends have branded him a “traitor.”

Bissinger remarked:

“There’s no doubt in my mind that there’s a definite liberal bias in the mainstream media…You are simply not expected, when you’re a journalist and a writer, to endorse a Republican. And don’t tell me it does not seep into the coverage. I mean, you look at The New York Times, you look at their editorial today on Afghanistan, you would feel it’s the Republicans’ fault we’re still there, but that’s Obama’s decision. It does seep in, and I know because as a journalist it seeped in when I wrote for the Philadelphia Enquirer.”

So what has he learned from the experience?
Bissinger said:

I thought liberals were supposed to be ‘open-minded.’ I thought they were supposed to accept divergent viewpoints to at least say, ‘hey, everyone in America has a right to an opinion.’ But it’s really about– ‘I love free speech as long as it’s the free speech that I want’ … Liberals have this sense of themselves, but 90% are as nasty, as vitriolic, as vicious as the conservatives they say are…

That is it! Once you go conservative, you can't go back... I guess Bissinger will be banned for life
Hi Út,

MiNo đọc bài này hồi bữa rồi, nhưng Út quote có phần này MiNo thấy ông ta nói về chính cái "dòng" mà he is stepping out of

There’s no doubt in my mind that there’s a definite liberal bias in the mainstream media. You are simply not expected, when you’re a journalist and a writer, to endorse a Republican.

Cái gì chứ cái trò... tuyên truyền sao...ớn quá ! chắc tại hồi xưa bị CS tẩy não, tuyên truyền nhiều quá nên đâm ra dị ứng.

Make sure that you use the media for information, but never be fooled by them to regurgitate their talking points.
MiNo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2012, 11:43 AM   #9
aqg
Lớp Tám
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,491
aqg is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by MiNo View Post
Quote:
" Không tui nghĩ tui liberals ở đây đứa nào cũng chẳng biết gì hết, chỉ có Mino là biết thôi.... How about that?
Đọc nghe nó... nhỏ mọn quá đấy bác !
Cô nói thì không sao, còn người khác nói thì nhỏ mọn đây. Tui thấy cô nhọn mỏ quá.

Nói chung thế này. Mình hơi thất vọng với nhiều bác CH (nói chung). Thua không bao giờ phục. Thua đổ thừa hoàn cảnh.
__________________

aqg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2012, 08:29 PM   #10
FAIR VIEW
Lớp Tám
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,564
FAIR VIEW is on a distinguished road
Actual Women Who Actually Worked With Romney Think He's Awesome

Sunshine State Sarah ^ | 10/17/12 | Sarah Rumpf

Posted on Wed Oct 17 2012 17:27:05 GMT-0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) by Nachum



The Left's attempts to keep their ridiculous "War on Women" afloat continue...

The latest example is the hyperventilating over Romney's comments at the debate last night that when he was elected Governor of Massachusetts, he had "binders full" of women's resumes to help him build his administration.

No, Romney doesn't actually want to trap women in binders. Idiots.

Now, if my future President would like to put a copy of my resume in a binder to review for potential employment, that would be just fine with me.

(Excerpt) Read more at sunshinestatesarah.com ...


Link : http://www.sunshinestatesarah.com/20...P1yL_k.twitter


__________________
FAIR VIEW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2012, 04:27 AM   #11
FAIR VIEW
Lớp Tám
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,564
FAIR VIEW is on a distinguished road
Shocking Video: The REAL Mitt Romney Exposed!

Shocking Video: The REAL Mitt Romney Exposed!





By Gary P Jackson

We often learn more about the folks that are constantly in the public eye, when there are no cameras, or at least no media around, than when they are being filmed and “on.”

This is from 2007, after the big fires in San Diego, California.

California sees devastating fires every year. This is something Texans experienced in 2011. It’s heartbreaking.

Anyhow, this is the story of some folks who were lucky, and didn’t lose their home, but lost some trees. As you can see, one was pretty big, and it’s roots enormous.




http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=oNJZrJVDpbY

Mitt Romney Gives Service to Fire Victims in San Diego


I don’t care what you think of Mitt Romney, politically, he’s obviously not the Great Satan™ many have made him out to be. He’s just a guy. Obviously a good guy.

I remember how proud all of us were when Sarah Palin went to Haiti to help bring awareness to the devastation and suffering.

We also loved that she went to Alabama to help victims of the tornadoes that ripped through the South and Midwest last Spring.

Of course her trips served two purposes. She genuinely wanted to help, and she got her hands dirty helping. She was also there to help bring more awareness, and even more help, through Samaritan’s Purse, thus the media coverage.

What Sarah did was real and heartfelt. So was what Mitt Romney did.

Again, you may not care for his political positions, but you must admit he’s not the person who many try to portray him as. He’s a good and decent man, and deserves some respect for that.





FAIR VIEW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2012, 09:47 AM   #12
FAIR VIEW
Lớp Tám
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,564
FAIR VIEW is on a distinguished road
For first time, Romney's favorability rating tops Obama's

For first time, Romney's favorability rating tops Obama's


WashingtonExaminer.com ^ | 10 19 12

Posted on Fri Oct 19 2012 05:39:10 GMT-0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) by InvisibleChurch

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has finally cleared what many aides have long seen as his biggest hurdle: A majority of voters now like him.

According to multiple polls, Romney's favorability rating has surged since the Republican National Convention and in most he equals or bests President Obama's favorables.

And late Thursday, the Pew Research Center, the poll that has been toughest on Romney's favorability, released results showing that Romney is ahead of Obama by a point, 50 percent to 49 percent. That is a stunning turnaround from March, when Obama's favorable rating in Pew was about twice Romney's, 55 percent to 29 percent.

Gallup also has Romney beating Obama on the favorability rating, 52 percent to 51 percent.

(Excerpt) Read more at WashingtonExaminer.com ...
FAIR VIEW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2012, 09:50 AM   #13
FAIR VIEW
Lớp Tám
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,564
FAIR VIEW is on a distinguished road
Candy Crowley's bosses must be prosecuted - they knew about the collusion

Candy Crowley's bosses must be prosecuted - they knew about the collusion


Logic | 19 October 2012 | Mene Mene Tekel Upharsin

Posted on Fri Oct 19 2012 05:26:12 GMT-0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Think.

Candy Crowley and Obama colluded in the debate. It's obvious. How would Obama know to tell her to "Get the transcript!" unless they had planned a response ahead of time on the Benghazi issue?

Then, Crowley enabled Obama's lie about the topic and cut Romney off. The next set of questions that must be asked must deal with the supervisors who knew that the collusion took place prior to the debate.


Candy Crowley did not have the authority to use her firm's equipment to video conference with the Obama camp about debate topics/answers (had to have video conferenced to try and cover -- couldn't be anywhere near each other physically, obviously).


Candy Crowley did NOT unilaterally decide to collude with the Obama camp.


People at all levels of Crowley's firm had to know this was taking place including the technicians who made it happen. Those individuals must be prosecuted for illegally trying to skew the governing process of this country. This is treason.
FAIR VIEW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2012, 02:21 AM   #14
FAIR VIEW
Lớp Tám
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,564
FAIR VIEW is on a distinguished road
Candy Crowley admits Romney was right during the debate

Candy Crowley admits Romney was right during the debate

[VIDEO and FACTS]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=athcyCTnTTs



netwmd.com ^ | 10/19/2012 | netWMD Staff

Posted on Fri Oct 19 2012 21:38:25 GMT-0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) by forty_years

The truth is out there and the moderator of the second presidential debate, Candy Crowley, has grudgingly admitted that Mitt Romney was correct when he said President Obama did not call the Benghazi atrocity, in which a U.S. ambassador was raped, killed, and dragged through the streets, a "terrorist attack." Her admission is shown in a video. But let's look at the facts, first:

BS: President Obama said during the debate that, "The day after the [Libya] attack, Governor, I stood in the Rose Garden, and I told the American people and the world that we are going to find out exactly what happened, that this was an act of terror."

TRUTH: CBS obtained Obama's Rose Garden transcript and conceded that, "It shows that the president did refer to 'acts of terror' -- but not specifically in reference to the Libya attack.


Instead, he made a broader statement about American defiance." CBS also admitted, "The questions during Tuesday night's town hall debate, which were chosen by Crowley, more often than not played into the president's hands -- perhaps reflecting the fact that the town hall was held in a blue state. And Crowley's decision to side with the president over whether he had deemed the Libya attack an act of terror, when the reality was not so clear cut, was a misstep."


Even more damning, while Obama spent weeks concentrating on some silly, amateurish video "upsetting" Muslims and trying to spin the savage murder of our ambassador, we know that, "Recently obtained memos show Ambassador Chris Stevens asked the State Department repeatedly for more security in Libya before he was killed in the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi..."

Last edited by FAIR VIEW : 10-20-2012 at 02:25 AM.
FAIR VIEW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2012, 02:35 AM   #15
FAIR VIEW
Lớp Tám
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,564
FAIR VIEW is on a distinguished road
the CIA is not going to take the fall for Obama on Libya-gate

No, the CIA is not going to take the fall for Obama on Libya-gate

legal Insurrection ^

Posted on Fri Oct 19 2012 20:36:04 GMT-0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) by Perdogg

In a ritual as old as the existence of the modern intelligence community, leaks are beginning to spill out protecting the CIA from having to take the fall for Obama’s Libya cover-up.

(Excerpt) Read more at legalinsurrection.com ...



http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/10...on-libya-gate/
FAIR VIEW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2012, 12:28 AM   #16
FAIR VIEW
Lớp Tám
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,564
FAIR VIEW is on a distinguished road
Krauthammer: White House ‘lied’ on Libya because they had ‘the media in their pocket’

Krauthammer: White House ‘lied’ on Libya because they had ‘the media in their pocket’

Politics

3:33 AM 10/20/2012



On Friday night’s broadcast of “Hannity” on the Fox News Channel, host Sean Hannity asked Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer why the White House waited so long to acknowledge that the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. embassy in Benghazi was a pre-planned terrorist strike.

According to Krauthammer, the Obama administration delayed announcing the news primarily to protect the president’s image on foreign policy.

“They had two reasons to lie,” Krauthammer said. “The first reason was the fact that the Sept. 11 attack occurred a week after they just spent four days in Charlotte dancing on the grave of bin Laden. Remember, this is their single foreign policy achievement. There is none other. Look at Iran Look at Russia. Look at Israel. Look at Syria. Look at the Arab spring. It’s all in collapse. They got one thing to argue, and they sure argued it, where they made the point again and again and again with that ridiculous slogan from Vice President [Biden], ‘bin laden dead, GM alive,’ because what Libya said, what it was proclaiming to the world and the reason the attack was launched in the first place was to say, ‘bin Laden dead, al-Qaida alive.’ That is what has happened as a result of leading from behind in Libya.”

Krauthammer said the problems stemming from the president’s foreign policy extend beyond Libya.

“You’ve got, you know, al-Qaida has — essentially one of the jihadist factions taken over northern Mali,” Krauthammer said. “There are training camps throughout North Africa. And we now know about the rise of the strength of the jihadist in Syria, where Obama has again has been leading from behind.”

Krauthammer, who is also a regular on Fox News Channel’s “Special Report” and the weekend syndicated show “Inside Washington,”added that, in those shows, he had been pressed to explain why the White House would think it could get away with its apparent deception.

“The second thing is, and I heard from this from liberal colleagues on some of the other shows I’ve done, is, ‘Well, how could they have done this? Why would they be lying? Wouldn’t they know it would come out?’” Krauthammer said. “And the answer is no. They saw what the mainstream media did right after the attack. And you know what they did — they spent three days attacking Mitt Romney for a statement he issued the next day, in which he denounced what the Cairo embassy released, the apologetic statement that was made.”

“So the media went ahead and spent three days ignoring the attack, ignoring the implications and concentrating always on that,” he continued. “So they think they got the media in their pocket. The election is coming up. They simply have to run out the clock, and they’ll be scot-free. They’ll be home free. And that is what they thought. However, it was you and others and Bret Baier and Fox which kept the story alive, because we kept finding out what really happened. And now the mainstream media had been shamed to covering it themselves.”

Follow Jeff on Twitter
FAIR VIEW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2012, 12:18 PM   #17
FAIR VIEW
Lớp Tám
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,564
FAIR VIEW is on a distinguished road
UN Warns Americans: Do Not Elect Mitt Romney

" UN Warns Americans: Do Not Elect Mitt Romney"

Breitbart.com ^ | 10/20/2012 | Joel B. Pollak

Posted on Sun Oct 21 2012 08:45:19 GMT-0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) by Silentgypsy

The United Nations Special Rapporteur on Counter-Terrorism and Human Rights has warned Americans not to elect Republican Mitt Romney in next month’s presidential election, saying that doing so would be “a democra tic mandate for torture.”

The UN’s Ben Emmerson was referring to Romney’s refusal to rule out the use of waterboarding in interrogating terror detainees, a practice that President Barack Obama has ended.

Colin Perkel of The Canadian Press reported Emmerson’s remarks from a symposium in Toronto on the impact of 9/11 on human rights:

"The re-introduction of torture under a Romney administration would significantly increase the threat levels to (Americans) at home and abroad," Emmerson said.

"Such a policy, if adopted, would expose the American people to risks the Obama administration is not currently exposing them to."

U.S. intelligence services were able to pinpoint Osama bin Laden’s location and carry out the successful mission to kill him in May 2011 based on information yielded during waterboarding of 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, and information from Al Qaeda operative Hassan Ghul, who was captured in Iraq in 2004.

Obama opposed both waterboarding and the Iraq War, without which bin Laden would not have been found.

Emmerson warned that Romney could reinstate waterboarding if he took office. He also criticized the Obama administration’s drone program--an initiative begun by the Bush administration but accelerated by President Obama, partly because of his reluctance to capture, detain or interrogate terror suspects.

In a second term, Obama may renew efforts to close the Guantanámo Bay prison, despite widespread public opposition.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ..
FAIR VIEW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 12:39 AM   #18
FAIR VIEW
Lớp Tám
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,564
FAIR VIEW is on a distinguished road
White House knew al Qaeda-linked group claimed responsibility for deadly Libya ...TWO

White House knew al Qaeda-linked group claimed responsibility for deadly Libya ...TWO HOURS later


UK Daily Mail ^ | 10/23/12 | Daily Mail Reporter

Posted on Tue Oct 23 2012 20:44:28 GMT-0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) by Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears

Officials at the White House and State Department were alerted two hours after attackers stormed the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, on September 11 that an Islamic militant group had claimed credit for the assault, emails show.

The emails, obtained by Reuters from government sources not connected with U.S. spy agencies or the State Department and who requested anonymity, specifically mention that the Libyan group called Ansar al-Sharia had asserted responsibility for the attacks.

The brief missives also show how U.S. diplomats described the attack, even as it was still under way, to Washington.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
FAIR VIEW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 12:47 AM   #19
FAIR VIEW
Lớp Tám
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,564
FAIR VIEW is on a distinguished road
Romney campaign: Obama misled himself on Libya

Romney campaign: Obama misled himself on Libya

Posted By Josh Rogin Monday, October 22, 2012 - 4:41 PM

For those angry about Mitt's performance (and for those who understood it) - this confirms the strategy, and the Romney campaign outlook on Benghazi.
*******************************************
...ForeignPolicy.com...snip...
"That's a big fundamental problem that the administration has to deal with, that they did mislead people for a period of time, and what's even scarier, they misled themselves."
...snip...

*******************************************

(Excerpt) Read more at thecable.foreignpolicy.com ...


http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/10/22/romney_campaign_obama_misled_himself_on_libya
FAIR VIEW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 10:50 AM   #20
FAIR VIEW
Lớp Tám
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,564
FAIR VIEW is on a distinguished road
Obama lied, Americans died (Benghazigate)

Obama lied, Americans died (Benghazigate)

WND.com ^ | October 23, 2012 | Pamela Geller

Posted on Wed Oct 24 2012 07:29:44 GMT-0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) by Perseverando


Pamela Geller hits president over Benghazi response, 'pro-jihadist policy'

Despite the Obama administration’s lies and exploitation of the slaughter of our ambassador in Libya and three of his attaches in order to advance the brutal blasphemy laws under the Shariah, the truth about the act of war perpetuated against our great nation on Sept. 11, 2012, continues to leak out. The sunlight of truth is peeking through the cracks of the wall of disinformation and deception of a corrupt and complicit media.

Now it has come out that Libyan Ambassador Chris Stevens warned in emails about the rise of “Islamic extremism” in Libya and even wrote about seeing “the al-Qaida flag” in Benghazi, months before he was murdered by those same Islamic jihadists. He even wrote about an attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi in June by “an Islamic extremist group, ‘the Imprisoned Sheikh Omar Abdul-Rahman Brigade.’” Omar Abdel Rahman, the Blind Sheikh, is the mastermind of the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993. He is currently imprisoned in the U.S.

This follows revelations that a former Gitmo al-Qaida detainee tied to Osama bin Laden was the leader of the jihadi attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi and the assassination of an American ambassador and three diplomats. The president’s response? Lie to cover for the jihad.

Obama’s State Department initially blamed our freedom of speech for the attack on our embassies in Egypt and Libya. They did this even though they knew for a certainty within 24 hours after the attack in Libya that it was a jihad, planned for weeks beforehand. And they did this even though there was a U.S. drone over the consulate in Benghazi at the time of the attack, which should have made for a quicker American response to the attack.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
FAIR VIEW is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:11 AM.




Header Designed By Ban Điều Hành Hạt Nắng
Spring style created by vbImpressions
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.